In the opening hearing, Myanmar denied the genocide allegations and described the claims as exaggerated. Government representatives argued that military operations were aimed at insurgent groups and were not intended to target civilians. While acknowledging some abuses, officials said they were isolated incidents and insisted they are being investigated domestically.
Human rights organisations have described the proceedings as a historic test of international justice, noting that the ICJ is one of the few international bodies capable of holding a state accountable for alleged genocide. The case could have far-reaching implications for how the international community addresses mass atrocities and enforces obligations under the Genocide Convention.
The ICJ will continue to hear arguments from both sides in the coming weeks. A ruling could not only affect Myanmar’s international standing but also set a precedent for accountability in cases of mass violence against minority populations.
